"Apology" in Five Dialogues 2e, trans. G.M.A. Grube, rev. John M. Cooper (Hackett, 2002)
I'm preparing for the Grand Move, and realized that this book is packed away, oops! So, you know, it might be a little short.
The trial of Socrates is one of my favorite stories in philosophy. Which says something as I got into philosophy for the stories. There is something enormously compelling about the image of this pug-nosed old geezer daring Athens to put him to death.
What we have in this dialogue is the "transcript" of Socrates' defense at his trial. Before a 500 man jury, Socrates is expected to defend himself against the fairly serious charges of corrupting the youth and atheism/worshiping false gods. It is also in this dialogue that we see the formulation of the idea that Socrates is the wisest man because he knows that he knows nothing.
Showing posts with label ancient philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ancient philosophy. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Hypatia's Girl Angrily Reads the Presocratics
A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments and Testimonia, ed. Patricia Curd, Trans. Richard D. McKirahan (Hackett, 1996)
This one's a little difficult to blog, because it covers a good 300 years and 19 disparate thinkers. All in, you know, 106 pages.
It's been longer than I like to admit since I've really done any work with the old ancient philosophers, at least 2 years since that Aristotle class, and heavens knows when before that class that I would have done much work on the ancients. Which is not to say that I don't think the history of philosophy is important, it's mostly that I kind of always thought that I found the ancients kind of boring. Well, except for Heraclitus, who is clearly the most bad-ass of bad-asses. (And also, in the interest of scrupulous honesty, "kind of boring" can be wielded against a lot of philosophy, particularly if you're not used to reading it, or its A.J. Ayer. Just saying.)
As I was pleasantly surprised to discover, a good ten years of philosophy education and general growing up can make reading the pre-Socratics much more fun.
This one's a little difficult to blog, because it covers a good 300 years and 19 disparate thinkers. All in, you know, 106 pages.
It's been longer than I like to admit since I've really done any work with the old ancient philosophers, at least 2 years since that Aristotle class, and heavens knows when before that class that I would have done much work on the ancients. Which is not to say that I don't think the history of philosophy is important, it's mostly that I kind of always thought that I found the ancients kind of boring. Well, except for Heraclitus, who is clearly the most bad-ass of bad-asses. (And also, in the interest of scrupulous honesty, "kind of boring" can be wielded against a lot of philosophy, particularly if you're not used to reading it, or its A.J. Ayer. Just saying.)
As I was pleasantly surprised to discover, a good ten years of philosophy education and general growing up can make reading the pre-Socratics much more fun.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)